10 comments on “Selfish Single Mothers and Black Crime in America 

  1. Great post. That is so evil to consciously bring fatherless children into the world. It isn’t like the stats on those children aren’t well-documented – drug abuse, promiscuity, prison, etc. (sorry if this posts multiple times . . . WordPress makes it so hard to comment!)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. P.S. As a 6-time and current cancer patient, I’m so glad my wife isn’t like the lady in that video! My wife has been the best throughout all of this.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Eboni K Williams comes across as a selfish narcissist. She should just live out her life childless if she can’t find a man to marry. I do NOT support such choices. However, we need to be honest about the realities of marriages where the wife significantly out earns her husband. They don’t fare well from what I have read over the years.

    Anecdotally, We know several black families in such a situation, and a couple of other families like that, and NONE of the marriages are solid. In most, the husband has stepped out at least once, sometimes more than that. Why?

    I would argue that the woman as main breadwinner defies the natural order the Creator designed and intended. I wonder if it’s too demoralizing and emasculating for a man to have his woman provide for the family and so he looks to other women to supply that respect that is unattainable at home, even with the best wife, because our culture respects the one who pays the bills.

    The proliferation of young black men being born into the chaos and dysfunction of single mother families, combined with our society’s determination to promote and elevate women “of color” in all spheres means that we will continue to see black women who are out earning and more “educated” than most black men*, and this problem will get worse before it gets better.

    * these “educations” are anything but, and as a wife who is “more educated” than her husband, I know how silly it all is. Despite his lack of college education (he’s actually VERY educated), he has provided well for our family, earned 6 figures, and was the sole breadwinner for the first 27 years of our marriage. Even now, he earns 95% of what we make.

    But…he was raised in an intact family with a strong father and around strong men with excellent work ethics. He was set up for success. My husband is smart and resourceful, and thinks deeply, because he saw his “uneducated” father reading widely and he realized that the world was bigger than his neighborhood. Mental compatibility matters more now than it ever has, for worse and for better.

    I would NOT have married a man who wasn’t prepared to be the primary earner because my father raised me to believe that that is not how it should be. Black women in America are largely a hot toddy mess, and I am not excusing their nonsense. I blame most of them in my generation for the fact that there are so few marriageable black men compared to the women (if you are using metrics such as education and careers). But you need to be able to come home at the end of the day and have a conversation with your mate. An attorney and a bus driver with a HS diploma are probably going to have a hard time relating as the mundaneness of married life sets in.

    Some of women’s expectations are unreasonable, but not all standards are unreasonable. 50 years is a long time to be married to someone to whom you are on a different mental plane.

    Like

      • To be more clear, I am not justifying her actions for several reasons:

        Firstly, I believe IVF is sinful. Seriously, I believe deliberately having a baby without a father is sinful. Thirdly, everything I’ve seen from her indicated narcissistic tendencies. I offer no excuses for Ms. Williams.

        None of that changes the reality that successful marriage requires some level of compatibility.

        I think Rock and I have dialogued enough here that he gets where I’m coming from.

        Like

      • Hi Els!

        lol, I do get where you’re coming from. But the emphasis on compatibility, I think hits on the rather unsavory trend of overemphasizing “why we are the way we are” while spending less time focusing on “where do we go from here.”

        For instance when you say, “I would NOT have married a man who wasn’t prepared to be the primary earner because my father raised me to believe that that is not how it should be.”

        I understand that point. However, this also a big problem that doesn’t NEED to be a problem if ladies adjusted that mindset. We could shine a spotlight on men for not being “economically attractive,” but Biblically, if he’s earning and providing then he’s doing his job.

        I think it’s important to teach ladies this because, it’s like so many have this “frog in the well” mentality, as if it’s simply impossible to love, cherish, respect, and stay committed to your man unless he makes more than you and I’m not sure there’s any Scriptures that support that mindset. Which leads me to believe it’s a worldly one.

        Our role as leader isn’t defined by our finances. It’s defined by God. Perhaps if both the husband and wife leaned more into that, they wouldn’t be concerned about who the breadwinner is, because Biblically, while I won’t go so far as to say it’s irrelevant, the love and prioritizing of Christ first would outweigh it. (no disrespect to those couples you mentioned. I have no idea how spiritually strong they are).

        And let’s say the man makes more than her at the beginning of the marriage, but two years later, she makes more with a higher career position. Now what? Thus, I think that principle is a bit illogical and I’d encourage every man to avoid getting married to a woman with that mentality.

        I think this is a huge reason why the Passport movement is so strong, to be honest. I would not raise my daughter to be that way because essentially, I’d be boxing her in to a limited pool of suitors.

        Like

      • When the Bible commands wives to be “keepers at home”, at the very LEAST, it is obvious that the lion’s share of her energy should be spent on her home and family. The biology of childbirth, nursing, even menstruation are clear indicators in natural law that woman as primary earner defies the created order.

        Our modern insistence that we can override what is designed through birth control, day care, and all the rest doesn’t change what is true. I suggest you read the website “daycares don’t care” for a cold dose of reality.

        Keep in mind that I am speaking in generalities. Of course husbands sometimes get sick, lose jobs, and things happen where wives have to step up.

        Nevertheless, I an eternally grateful for the day my husband declared, “You need to come home. My babies need to be raised by their mother, not Miss Bea” ( the lady who kept our oldest from when she was 3 months to 1 year).

        Luckily, most people these days of both sexes, even Christians, are feminists so it’s okay.

        I sincerely apologize if my view is offensive.

        Like

      • “The biology of childbirth, nursing, even menstruation are clear indicators in natural law that woman as primary earner defies the created order”

        Perhaps. And even if I agreed with that notion, I don’t think it’d be a problem if ladies believed in living modest humble lifestyles within the means of the men they fall for.

        I keep putting this on women, because it is their choice. The only one we can control is ourselves. So, if they choose to make a lot of money, they choose to prioritize climbing that corporate ladder, or they choose a “better” lifestyle…the only ones they have to blame are themselves. Again, that’s only working on the presumption that men being the primary earner is the “created order”. Which, I clearly disagree with.

        One of the things I loved about the article I suggested is where they write, “Respect from your wife, your kids, and your community will be given to you if you work hard. This message has evaded too many men of this generation. Diligent, consistent effort at any and every job is glorifying to God (Col. 3:23). A man who puts everything into his work despite the pay ought to hold his head up high. If he has given everything he has, day in and day out, then there is no reason to be ashamed. A problem arises when husbands resign to let their wives carry the financial load while they give minimal effort. This is slothful and lazy. The scriptures warn against living in such a manner (see 1 Tim. 5:8 with great warning).”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Fair enough. I am not against women working, nor am I against women earning well.

        I am, unapologetically and with full bias, against babies being torn from their mothers and handed over to hirelings. I think Scripture heavily alludes to the important relationship between suckling aged babies (under 5) and mothers.

        So…there’s my bias. I stand here, unmovable, unless there is a clear reason why a wife needs to make that choice.

        That was a good article. Thanks for sharing. Unfortunately, people are rarely, if ever, moved solely by facts and logic.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment